netegory.net

Archive for November, 2011

-- Featured Comments -- i think this is sarcasm....but i would also like to add...the road to hell is paved with good intentions. if the politicians would stick to the basics none of this would be necessary.....its a joke now how much money is wasted.The role of goverment is to protect individual rights. This is nothing but a violation of the rights of the business leaders of AT&T. As envious as people often are of business executives and Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- Exactly right Wes. It is like the Groundhog Day movie. Dems promise spending cut int the future (or real immigration controls in the future) if only the Republicans will do something right now (e.g. raise taxes as GHWB did or allow an amnesty program for illegals as Reagan did). And of course the Dems pocket their "winnings" with never any intent on following through with their part of the bargain. To call it a Faustian Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- Well, then we are in big trouble because these folks have nothing better to do than vote - and the truly elderly ones (that missed the 60's where people began to question their government) use absolutely no logical thinking when they vote. In 2008 I surveyed a group of elderly white Southern ladies that were standing at a Sarah Palin campaign, collecting Palin pins and bumper stickers. I asked them "why do you support Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- If the WSJ can publish the normally sober Senator's silly screed, it's only fair that readers should be able compare it with what Julian Assange has written in an op-ed piece in The Australian. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/dont-shoot-messenger-for-revealing-uncomfortable-truths/story-fn775xjq-1225967241332 Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths WIKILEAKS deserves protection, Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- The story says that right of center politicians were "quick to denounce the killings" because they were afraid of a backlash against them. Perhaps, WSJ reporter, they were quick to denounce the killings because the killings are evil and terrible. Ever think of that WSJ reporter? And when someone is that right wing, they cease to be simply right of center. They certainly are not conservative or interested in liberty Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- In regard to your logical argument, overhead costs are covered by Federal funds that are necessary to providing abortions by Planned Parenthood. Otherwise they could simply split into two independent "entities" (with independent tax IDs) and continue doing things exactly as they are. The fact that they are so vehemently opposed to this proves that cost shifting is taking place.if you have $X of overhead and expenses, Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- The telling issue however is that those who want big government need the money from those who want to work for themselves. Those in big government don't generate the money to pay their own bills. In a broad sense think of the UAW. They care about what the union gets to have and give away. Whether the company that provides these funds will survive is effectively immaterial. As such unions don't want any right-to-work Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- This story has turned out to be another letdown for the people that want Obama to fail. First you were letdown when the healthcare bill passed. Your conversations had it not passed would have been how incompetent the President is for not getting a healthcare bill passed with a democratic majority. That was suppose to be Obama's Waterloo, remember. Now you thought you were going to pen racism on the NAACP to counter Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- Yes, the climate changes. Science knows not why nor what to do about it. Magnetic pole shift is just as real, currently measurable to a high degree of accuracy, more certain, and likely to happen much more rapidly than average temperature changes in atmosphere or surface strata. An extended period of extremely weak or nonexistent magnetic field could result in far greater catastrophe than even the most severe climate Read More...

-- Featured Comments -- I agree. Calling this a moral argument is just red meat tossed out to keep the Tea Party riled up and glued to a naive script about good versus evil based solely on belief."Come November 2012, you can bet the ranch that the furious left will vote for Barack Obama. And the Obama campaign has to hope that the Republicans will keep voting as they did in Iowa and produce a nominee that pretty much no one wants to vote Read More...